Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement is Safe/Better: Refuting the Wall Street Journal

The October 14, 2008 edition of the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled "New Doubts About Popular Joint Surgery". The following excerpt from the WSJ raises issues concerning Minimaly Invasive Joint Replacement surgery (MIS).

"But patients aren't always told that minimally invasive surgery is more difficult to perform than a traditional operation. Because of the smaller incision, surgeons have a harder time seeing what they are doing. And because minimally invasive surgery has grown so fast, many doctors don't have extensive experience performing the complicated procedure."

As an experienced MIS Knee Replacement Surgeon I completely agree with the above quoted comments. However, the other side to the story is that experienced surgeons using computer surgical navigation have patients with consistently excellent outcomes and complication rates as low or lower than traditional joint replacement surgeons.

I would like to address the three issue raised. First, "minimally invasive surgery is more difficult that a tradition joint replacement". There is a known "learning curve" of approximately 25 cases, after which most surgeons will have mastered the MIS technique. I have been performing MIS Total Knee Replacement since 2004 and to date have over 500 cases experience. The transition to MIS replacement will occur with time and can be compared to the transition in sports medicine from open "traditional" knee and shoulder surgery in the past to current arthroscopic treatment for most knee and shoulder injuries.

Secondly, "because of the smaller incision, surgeons have a harder time seeing what they are doing". Using Computer surgical navigation intraoperatively or computer generated surgical cutting blocks preoperatively provides the Minimally Invasive Joint surgeon with the information needed to accurately place the new hip or knee joint using the smaller incision. Computer technology more than overcomes the exposure issue raised in this second point. I personally do not perform MIS Total Knee Replacement unless I have computer navigation or computer generated cutting blocks.

Third, "because minimally invasive surgery has grown so fast, many doctors don't have extensive experience performing the complicated procedure". Every major city and some smaller towns have compentent, experienced minimally invasive joint replacement surgeons. As a patient, do your research and find the well trained, experienced minimally invasive joint replacement surgeon and you will often times be rewarded by a faster recovery and a less painful experience while getting all the long term benefits of traditional total joint replacement.